Monday, July 26, 2010

Bieber's Voice and Michael Jackson

I sometimes imagine what Michael Jackson's voice would've sounded like if he had never taken hormone treaments to stunt his pubescent phase. Would his voice have change? What would it have sounded like? Would he still have been as talented? One thing's for sure: his best albums (Thriller, Bad) would've sounded drastically different.

Though some might see it as immoral to prevent a child singer's voice from changing, the Catholic church used to castrate (cut the balls off of) young male singers as far back as the 1550's to prevent their voices from changing.

So...Bieber: you're gonna have to make the choice soon. Do you want to carry that awesome voice you have to adulthood, or do you want to be another one hit wonder/ former child star? It's a tough choice especially considering that the hormone treatment turned Michael Jackson into some sort of alien child molesting creature. Not an easy choice.

2 comments:

  1. Thats just a rumor. He never took any hormones, and his voice DID change. He just developed differently! So did Justin Timberlake. Bieber's time will come as well.
    And COME ON, he didnt molest anyone. Those people were just after his money. As soon as he paid the first one off we never heard from them again. The second time he was set free.
    Society is superficial, he didnt LOOK normal, so people assumed he was some kind of freak. sad.

    ReplyDelete
  2. His voice was worth millions so his agents convinced him to undergo treatment. Don't be so naive. Nobody naturally develops like that. And I'm pretty sure that Timberlake's voice changed before he joined NSYNC.

    And the whole molestation thing is well supported by documented evidence that you can check out at thesmokinggun.com. The first boy could describe identifying marks on Jackson's penis.

    ReplyDelete